>>THERE’S NO BATTLE WITH OR WITHOUT VELOSS RAPTOR. WITHOUT VELOSS RAPTOR.>>WHEN “ALL IN” STARTS RIGHT>>WHEN “ALL IN” STARTS RIGHT NOW. NOW.>>>GOOD EVENING FROM NEW YORK.>>>GOOD EVENING FROM NEW YORK. THE PRESIDENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN THE PRESIDENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN EXONERATED BY ROBERT MUELLER. EXONERATED BY ROBERT MUELLER. BUT HE SURE IS ACTING LIKE IT. BUT HE SURE IS ACTING LIKE IT. TWO DAYS AFTER THE RELEASE OF A TWO DAYS AFTER THE RELEASE OF A FOUR-PAGE LETTER SELECTIVELY FOUR-PAGE LETTER SELECTIVELY QUOTING THE MUELLER REPORT THAT QUOTING THE MUELLER REPORT THAT ALMOST NO ONE HAS SEEN WHICH ALMOST NO ONE HAS SEEN WHICH TRUMP FALSELY CLAIMED AMOUNTED TRUMP FALSELY CLAIMED AMOUNTED TO A FULL EXONERATION, THE TO A FULL EXONERATION, THE PRESIDENT IS ADDING A FLEUR PRESIDENT IS ADDING A FLEUR TOOGS THE VICTORY LAP. TOOGS THE VICTORY LAP. MOVE TO STRIP HEALTH CARE MOVE TO STRIP HEALTH CARE COVERAGE FOR MORE THAN 20 COVERAGE FOR MORE THAN 20 MILLION AMERICANS AND THROW THE MILLION AMERICANS AND THROW THE ENTIRE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN ENTIRE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN THIS COUNTRY INTO UTTER CHAOS. THIS COUNTRY INTO UTTER CHAOS. AND IT NOW AGREED BY A DECEMBER AND IT NOW AGREED BY A DECEMBER RULING STRIKING DOWN, IN RULING STRIKING DOWN, IN RESPONSE TO A LAWSUIT BY GROUP RESPONSE TO A LAWSUIT BY GROUP OF CONSERVATIVE ATTORNEYS OF CONSERVATIVE ATTORNEYS GENERAL. GENERAL. THAT WAS SEEN ACROSS PARTISAN THAT WAS SEEN ACROSS PARTISAN AND IDEOLOGICAL SPECTRUM OF AND IDEOLOGICAL SPECTRUM OF OUTSIDE THE MAINSTREAM. OUTSIDE THE MAINSTREAM. SO FAR OUTSIDE THE MAINSTREAM SO FAR OUTSIDE THE MAINSTREAM THAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION THAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ITSELF DID NOT INITIALLY SUPPORT ITSELF DID NOT INITIALLY SUPPORT IT AND NOW THEY DO. IT AND NOW THEY DO. MORE THAN A LEGAL BATTLE MORE THAN A LEGAL BATTLE EXPECTED TO READ THE REPORT. EXPECTED TO READ THE REPORT. WHAT WOULD IT MEAN IF TRUMP GETS WHAT WOULD IT MEAN IF TRUMP GETS ITS WAY AND OBAMA CARE IS STRUCK ITS WAY AND OBAMA CARE IS STRUCK DOWN? DOWN? MORE THAN 20 MILLION PEOPLE MORE THAN 20 MILLION PEOPLE COVERED WILL BE STRIPPED OF COVERED WILL BE STRIPPED OF THEIR COVERAGE, TAKEN AWAY. THEIR COVERAGE, TAKEN AWAY. THERE WILL NO LONGER BE THERE WILL NO LONGER BE PROTECTIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH PROTECTIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH PREEXISTING CONDITIONS. PREEXISTING CONDITIONS. IT’S CHANGING THEED DRAMATICALLY IT’S CHANGING THEED DRAMATICALLY AND WILL BE THROWN INTO CHAOS. AND WILL BE THROWN INTO CHAOS. IT WOULD HAVE HUGELY DIRE IT WOULD HAVE HUGELY DIRE CONSEQUENCES FOR TENS OF CONSEQUENCES FOR TENS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE, EVEN BY MILLIONS OF PEOPLE, EVEN BY THOSE NOT COVERED BY OBAMA CARE. THOSE NOT COVERED BY OBAMA CARE. THOSE ARE THE REAL WORLD THOSE ARE THE REAL WORLD IMPLICATIONS. IMPLICATIONS. AND THE POLITICAL REPER AND THE POLITICAL REPER CUSHIONS. CUSHIONS. AND OVERWHELMINGLY OPPOSE AND OVERWHELMINGLY OPPOSE PROTECTIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH PROTECTIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH PREEXISTING CONDITIONS. PREEXISTING CONDITIONS. JUST THIS MORNING THEY UNVEILED JUST THIS MORNING THEY UNVEILED A BILL TO STRENGTHEN PROTECTIONS A BILL TO STRENGTHEN PROTECTIONS WHILE LOWERING PREMIUMS AND THEY WHILE LOWERING PREMIUMS AND THEY TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY TO TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPOTLIGHT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SPOTLIGHT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES. THE TWO PARTIES.>>THE GOP WILL NEVER STOP>>THE GOP WILL NEVER STOP TRYING TO DESTROY THE AFFORDABLE TRYING TO DESTROY THE AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE OF AMERICA’S HEALTH CARE OF AMERICA’S FAMILIES. FAMILIES. IN THIS HOUSE WITH THE IN THIS HOUSE WITH THE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY WE’RE HERE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY WE’RE HERE TO STRENGTHEN THOSE PROTECTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THOSE PROTECTIONS AND TO LOWER HEALTH CARE COSTS AND TO LOWER HEALTH CARE COSTS FURTHER. FURTHER. BECAUSE THIS HOUSE, THIS BECAUSE THIS HOUSE, THIS DEMOCRATIC HOUSE IS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE IS FOR THE PEOPLE. PEOPLE.>>NINE YEARS AFTER OBAMACARE>>NINE YEARS AFTER OBAMACARE BECAME LAW, REPUBLICANS STILL, BECAME LAW, REPUBLICANS STILL, STILL HAVE YET TO PRODUCE A STILL HAVE YET TO PRODUCE A WORKABLE OBAMACARE REPLACEMENT WORKABLE OBAMACARE REPLACEMENT BILL. BILL. WHAT THEY HAVE DONE IS DEVELOP A WHAT THEY HAVE DONE IS DEVELOP A NEW STRATEGY WHICH IS TO INSIST NEW STRATEGY WHICH IS TO INSIST THEY ACTUALLY SUPPORT PROTECTING THEY ACTUALLY SUPPORT PROTECTING PEOPLE WITH PREEXISTING PEOPLE WITH PREEXISTING CONDITIONS WHILE ACTIVELY CONDITIONS WHILE ACTIVELY WORKING TO DESTROY THEM AND TO WORKING TO DESTROY THEM AND TO MAKE MEANINGLESS PRONOUNCEMENTS MAKE MEANINGLESS PRONOUNCEMENTS LIKE BECOMING THE PARTY OF LIKE BECOMING THE PARTY OF HEALTH CARE. HEALTH CARE. NO EXPLANATION NEEDED. NO EXPLANATION NEEDED.>>THERE’S AN INCONSISTENCY, IF>>THERE’S AN INCONSISTENCY, IF NOT A HYPOCRISY HERE. NOT A HYPOCRISY HERE. WHY WOULD YOU MISLEAD THE WHY WOULD YOU MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT WAY? AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT WAY? WHY WOULD YOU SAY YOU SUPPORT WHY WOULD YOU SAY YOU SUPPORT THE BENEFIT OF THE PREEXISTING THE BENEFIT OF THE PREEXISTING CONDITIONS WHEN YOU VOTED TO CONDITIONS WHEN YOU VOTED TO ELIMINATE IT AND NOW ELIMINATE IT AND NOW OVERWHELMINGLY ARE PART OF A OVERWHELMINGLY ARE PART OF A LAWSUIT TO ELIMINATE IT AND LAWSUIT TO ELIMINATE IT AND SUPPORT AN ADMINISTRATION THAT SUPPORT AN ADMINISTRATION THAT WANTS TO DO AWAY WITH THE WHOLE WANTS TO DO AWAY WITH THE WHOLE BILL. BILL. JOINING ME IS DEMOCRATIC JOINING ME IS DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE, BERNIE SANDERS. CANDIDATE, BERNIE SANDERS. SURPRISED AT ALL BY THE MOVE BY SURPRISED AT ALL BY THE MOVE BY THE WHITE HOUSE DO DO THIS THE WHITE HOUSE DO DO THIS AND/OR THE TIMING? AND/OR THE TIMING?>>NO, NOT SURPRISED AT ALL.>>NO, NOT SURPRISED AT ALL. NOTHING TRUMP AND HIS FRIENDS DO NOTHING TRUMP AND HIS FRIENDS DO SURPRISES ME. SURPRISES ME. THE IDEA THAT THEY WOULD ASK THE THE IDEA THAT THEY WOULD ASK THE COURTS TO SAY THAT AFFORDABLE COURTS TO SAY THAT AFFORDABLE CARE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND CARE ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THROW UP THE 30 MILLION PEOPLE THROW UP THE 30 MILLION PEOPLE OFF OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE THEY OFF OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE THEY HAVE, DO AWAY WITH THE HAVE, DO AWAY WITH THE PROTECTIONS THEY HAVE, THE PROTECTIONS THEY HAVE, THE PREEXISTING CONDITIONS, DO AWAY PREEXISTING CONDITIONS, DO AWAY WITH THE FACT THAT YOUNG PEOPLE WITH THE FACT THAT YOUNG PEOPLE CAN HAVE THE INSURANCE THAT CAN HAVE THE INSURANCE THAT THEIR PARENTS HAVE, RAISE DRUG THEIR PARENTS HAVE, RAISE DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS. PRICES FOR SENIORS. IT’S AN OUTRAGE BUT WE’VE SEEN IT’S AN OUTRAGE BUT WE’VE SEEN THIS MOVIE BEFORE. THIS MOVIE BEFORE.>>ONE THING THAT’S BEEN>>ONE THING THAT’S BEEN MADDENING IS HE SAID IT WAS GO MADDENING IS HE SAID IT WAS GO DOING BE GREAT AND CHEAPER AND DOING BE GREAT AND CHEAPER AND EVERYONE WAS GOING TO GET IT. EVERYONE WAS GOING TO GET IT. PEOPLE REALLY BELIEVED IT. PEOPLE REALLY BELIEVED IT. HE ADDED AGAIN TODAY. HE ADDED AGAIN TODAY. DO YOU THINK THAT MESSAGE SELLS DO YOU THINK THAT MESSAGE SELLS OR DO PEOPLE SEE THROUGH IT? OR DO PEOPLE SEE THROUGH IT?>>I’M GOING TO DO EVERYTHING I>>I’M GOING TO DO EVERYTHING I CAN TO TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN TO TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE INCLUDING THE MANY PEOPLE WHO INCLUDING THE MANY PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP THAT HE IS AN VOTED FOR TRUMP THAT HE IS AN ABSOLUTE FRAUD. ABSOLUTE FRAUD. HE TALKED IN HIS CAMPAIGN ABOUT HE TALKED IN HIS CAMPAIGN ABOUT HEALTH CARE FOR EVERYONE AND HEALTH CARE FOR EVERYONE AND SUPPORTED LEGISLATION OF THE SUPPORTED LEGISLATION OF THE HEALTH CARE THEY HAVE. HEALTH CARE THEY HAVE. SO WE’VE GOT TO EXPOSE HIM FOR SO WE’VE GOT TO EXPOSE HIM FOR WHAT HE IS AND WE’VE GOT TO TALK WHAT HE IS AND WE’VE GOT TO TALK ABOUT WHERE WE SHOULD BE GOING ABOUT WHERE WE SHOULD BE GOING AS A COUNTRY. AS A COUNTRY. I DONT KNOW HOW MANY AMERICANS I DONT KNOW HOW MANY AMERICANS KNOW THAT WE’RE THE ONLY MAJOR KNOW THAT WE’RE THE ONLY MAJOR COUNTRY ON EARTH NOT TO COUNTRY ON EARTH NOT TO GUARANTEE HEALTH CARE TO ALL GUARANTEE HEALTH CARE TO ALL PEOPLE, THAT WE SPEND TWICE AS PEOPLE, THAT WE SPEND TWICE AS MUCH PER CAPITA FOR HEALTH CARE, MUCH PER CAPITA FOR HEALTH CARE, AND OUTCOMES IN TERMS OF LIFE AND OUTCOMES IN TERMS OF LIFE EXPECTANCY ARE NOT AS GOOD AS EXPECTANCY ARE NOT AS GOOD AS OTHER COUNTRIES. OTHER COUNTRIES. TATS TLR MESSAGE WE’VE GOT TO TATS TLR MESSAGE WE’VE GOT TO TAKE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. TAKE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. NOT TO MAKE BILLIONS IN PROFITS. NOT TO MAKE BILLIONS IN PROFITS.>>YOU TALK ABOUT WHERE WE>>YOU TALK ABOUT WHERE WE SHOULD GO. SHOULD GO. THE DEMOCRATS INTRODUCED THE DEMOCRATS INTRODUCED LEGISLATION IN THE HOUSE TODAY LEGISLATION IN THE HOUSE TODAY THAT IS FOCUSSED ON SOME REFORMS THAT IS FOCUSSED ON SOME REFORMS AND MODIFICATIONS FOR OBAMACARE, AND MODIFICATIONS FOR OBAMACARE, PARTICULARLY PEOPLE WITH VERY PARTICULARLY PEOPLE WITH VERY HIGH PREMIUMS. HIGH PREMIUMS. DO YOU SUPPORT LEGISLATION THE DO YOU SUPPORT LEGISLATION THE HOUSE PRODUCED TODAY? HOUSE PRODUCED TODAY? SO YOU DON’T SUPPORT THAT SO YOU DON’T SUPPORT THAT REFORM? REFORM?>>NO.>>NO. THE INCREMENTAL REFORM I SUPPORT THE INCREMENTAL REFORM I SUPPORT IS MEDICARE FOR ALL. IS MEDICARE FOR ALL. FIRST YEAR WE WOULDED LOWER THE FIRST YEAR WE WOULDED LOWER THE ELIGIBILITY AGE FROM 55 TO 65 ELIGIBILITY AGE FROM 55 TO 65 AND COVER ALL OF THE CHILDREN AND COVER ALL OF THE CHILDREN AND EXPAND MEDICARE COVERAGE FOR AND EXPAND MEDICARE COVERAGE FOR ELDERLY TO INCLUDE DENTAL CARE, ELDERLY TO INCLUDE DENTAL CARE, EYE GLASSES AND HEARING AIDS. EYE GLASSES AND HEARING AIDS. THAT’S THE INCREMENTAL FOUR-YEAR THAT’S THE INCREMENTAL FOUR-YEAR PROGRAM I WROTE AND I SUPPORT. PROGRAM I WROTE AND I SUPPORT.>>SO IF THAT HOUSE BILL WERE TO>>SO IF THAT HOUSE BILL WERE TO COME TO THE SENATE, YOU WOULD COME TO THE SENATE, YOU WOULD VOTE AGAINST IT? VOTE AGAINST IT?>>RIGHT NOW WE’RE WORKING ON>>RIGHT NOW WE’RE WORKING ON WHAT I HAVE FOUGHT FOR MY ENTIRE WHAT I HAVE FOUGHT FOR MY ENTIRE LIFE. LIFE. HEALTH CARE IS A RIGHT. HEALTH CARE IS A RIGHT. IT HAS TO BE COMPREHENSIVE. IT HAS TO BE COMPREHENSIVE. THE CURRENT SYSTEM IS THE CURRENT SYSTEM IS DYSFUNCTIONAL. DYSFUNCTIONAL. WE SPEND HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS WE SPEND HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS EVERY SINGLE YEAR ON EVERY SINGLE YEAR ON ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, OUTRAGES ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, OUTRAGES COMPENSATION PACKAGES. COMPENSATION PACKAGES. ULTIMATELY WE HAVE GOT TO DO ULTIMATELY WE HAVE GOT TO DO WHATEVER EVERY OTHER MAJOR WHATEVER EVERY OTHER MAJOR COUNTRY DOES AND SAVE HUGE COUNTRY DOES AND SAVE HUGE AMOUNTS MEDICARE FOR ALL. AMOUNTS MEDICARE FOR ALL.>>THERE’S BEEN INTERESTING>>THERE’S BEEN INTERESTING DEBATE ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS AND DEBATE ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS AND THERE’S TWO DIFFERENT WAYS THERE’S TWO DIFFERENT WAYS PEOPLE ARE TALK ABOUT IT NOW. PEOPLE ARE TALK ABOUT IT NOW. ONE YOU’VE TALKED ABOUT, ONE YOU’VE TALKED ABOUT, FOUR-YEAR PHASE AND THEOTHER IS FOUR-YEAR PHASE AND THEOTHER IS MEDICARE BUY IN. MEDICARE BUY IN. AND YOU CAN OPTION BY THE AND YOU CAN OPTION BY THE MEDICARE RACE. MEDICARE RACE. THERE’S A BILL WITH THAT NAME IN THERE’S A BILL WITH THAT NAME IN THE HOUSE. THE HOUSE. THAT WAS POLLING WELL. THAT WAS POLLING WELL. WHAT DO YOU THING ABOUT THAT AS WHAT DO YOU THING ABOUT THAT AS AN ALTERNATIVE? AN ALTERNATIVE? WHY NOT SLIDE TOWARDS THE SYSTEM WHY NOT SLIDE TOWARDS THE SYSTEM IN AN OPTIONAL WAY? IN AN OPTIONAL WAY?>>BECAUSE WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE>>BECAUSE WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT CURRENT SYSTEM IS THAT CURRENT SYSTEM IS INCREDIBLY DYSFUNCTIONAL AND INCREDIBLY DYSFUNCTIONAL AND WASTEFUL. WASTEFUL. ITS IT CAUSE — YOU’RE NOT GOING ITS IT CAUSE — YOU’RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO IN THE LONG RUN TO TO BE ABLE TO IN THE LONG RUN TO HAVE COST EFFECTIVE HEALTH CARE HAVE COST EFFECTIVE HEALTH CARE UNLESS YOU GET RID OF THE UNLESS YOU GET RID OF THE INSURANCE COMPANIES, STAND UP TO INSURANCE COMPANIES, STAND UP TO THE GREED AND LOWER PRESCRIPTION THE GREED AND LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG COSTS. DRUG COSTS. IF YOU CAN PROVIDE QUALITY CARE. IF YOU CAN PROVIDE QUALITY CARE. I LOOKED AT HEALTH CARE THE SAME I LOOKED AT HEALTH CARE THE SAME WAY AS I LOOK AT PUBLIC WAY AS I LOOK AT PUBLIC EDUCATION. EDUCATION. SAME WAY I LOOK AT POLICE SAME WAY I LOOK AT POLICE PROTECTION AND FIRE PROTECTION. PROTECTION AND FIRE PROTECTION. THAT IS THE MOST COST EFFECTIVE THAT IS THE MOST COST EFFECTIVE WAY TO HAVE HEALTH CARE FOR ALL. WAY TO HAVE HEALTH CARE FOR ALL.>>AND YOU’VE BEEN CONSISTENT ON>>AND YOU’VE BEEN CONSISTENT ON THAT. THAT. BUT THE QUESTION IS A, A PATH TO BUT THE QUESTION IS A, A PATH TO GET THERE AND WHAT FOR EXAMPLE GET THERE AND WHAT FOR EXAMPLE YOU VOTED FOR A ACA BECAUSE THAT YOU VOTED FOR A ACA BECAUSE THAT WAS AN IMPROVEMENT ON THE STATUS WAS AN IMPROVEMENT ON THE STATUS QUO. QUO. WOULD YOU VOTE FOR MEDICARE FOR WOULD YOU VOTE FOR MEDICARE FOR AMERICA IF THAT CAME UP IN THE AMERICA IF THAT CAME UP IN THE SENATE? SENATE?>>THAT AIN’T GOING TO COME UP>>THAT AIN’T GOING TO COME UP IN THE SENATE. IN THE SENATE.>>UNLESS MITCH McCONNELL WANT>>UNLESS MITCH McCONNELL WANT TO TROLL. TO TROLL.>>AND YOU HAVE REPUBLICAN>>AND YOU HAVE REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP THAT WANT TO THROW LEADERSHIP THAT WANT TO THROW MURT 30 MILLION PEOPLE OFF OF MURT 30 MILLION PEOPLE OFF OF HEALTH INSURANCE. HEALTH INSURANCE. I THINK WE’RE GOING TO STAY I THINK WE’RE GOING TO STAY FOCUSSED ON THE PRIZE THE PRIZE FOCUSSED ON THE PRIZE THE PRIZE IS HEALTH CARE FOR ALL AS A IS HEALTH CARE FOR ALL AS A RIGHT REGARDLESS OF INCOME THAT RIGHT REGARDLESS OF INCOME THAT WE NEED DOCTORS TO HAVE PLACES WE NEED DOCTORS TO HAVE PLACES WHERE THEY ARE, HAVE NURSES TO WHERE THEY ARE, HAVE NURSES TO TAKE ON THE DRUG COMPANIES. TAKE ON THE DRUG COMPANIES. AND LET ME BE VERY CLEAR. AND LET ME BE VERY CLEAR. I JUST SPOKE TO I THINK 35,000 I JUST SPOKE TO I THINK 35,000 PEOPLE AT THREE DIFFERENT PEOPLE AT THREE DIFFERENT RALLIES AND THE POINT I MADE IS RALLIES AND THE POINT I MADE IS THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE AN EASY THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE AN EASY FIGHT. FIGHT. WHEN YOU HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE WHEN YOU HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE AT 18% OF OUR GDP, WHEN WE’RE AT 18% OF OUR GDP, WHEN WE’RE SPENDING $11,000 HERE THE DRUG SPENDING $11,000 HERE THE DRUG COMPANIES ARE INCREDIBLE. COMPANIES ARE INCREDIBLE. THEY’RE GOING TO BUYING AND THEY’RE GOING TO BUYING AND SILLING POLITICIANS. SILLING POLITICIANS. THEY HAVE AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF THEY HAVE AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF LOBBYISTS THEY RESPOND A HUGE LOBBYISTS THEY RESPOND A HUGE AMOUNT OF MONEY ON CAMPAIGN AMOUNT OF MONEY ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS. CONTRIBUTIONS. AND THE ONLY WAY WE WIN — TO MY AND THE ONLY WAY WE WIN — TO MY MIND THIS IS A POLITICAL FIGHT. MIND THIS IS A POLITICAL FIGHT. DO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE STAND UP DO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE STAND UP AND TAKE ON THE SPECIAL AND TAKE ON THE SPECIAL INTERESTS OR NOT? INTERESTS OR NOT?>>IRONICALLY THEY’RE NOT>>IRONICALLY THEY’RE NOT PSYCHED ON THE IDEA OF THE PSYCHED ON THE IDEA OF THE SUPREME COURT STRIKING DOWN SUPREME COURT STRIKING DOWN OBAMACARE ONE DAY AND EVERYONE